Server racks and network equipment in a data center. Illustrative image, color-adjusted with AI support.

Case Study · Software & Portals

Separating tenants securely Security assessment of a white-label NFT marketplace

Partner project by Innowise

Project profile

  • CustomerNot named
  • PartnerInnowise
  • IndustryDigital marketplaces
01

Challenge

A provider offers a white-label NFT marketplace solution for different brands. The central question of the security assessment was whether the customer environments remain effectively separated from one another, and what weaknesses exist in access to accounts and stored data.

02

Solution

Testing attack surfaces deliberately

Innowise created test cases for password security, SQL injection and cross-site scripting, among others. The focus was on the isolation of the individual tenants and on the rules for access and data storage.

Assessment areas instead of invented architecture

The assessment covered both application functions and permission rules. The diagram therefore shows the protection boundaries that were tested. It does not assert any particular database partitioning, cloud topology or blockchain implementation.

Assessment boundaries of the white-label platform

Assessment boundaries of the white-label platformTenant A: Own marketplace → Permissions: Review access; Tenant B: Own marketplace → Permissions: Review access; Tenant C: Own marketplace → Permissions: Review access; Permissions: Review access → Web application: Review attack surfaces; Permissions: Review access → Data storage: Review protection.Tenant AOwn marketplaceTenant BOwn marketplaceTenant COwn marketplacePermissionsReview accessWeb applicationReview attack surfacesData storageReview protection

Tenant A: Own marketplace → Permissions: Review access; Tenant B: Own marketplace → Permissions: Review access; Tenant C: Own marketplace → Permissions: Review access; Permissions: Review access → Web application: Review attack surfaces; Permissions: Review access → Data storage: Review protection.

Technologies

  • Acunetix
  • Netsparker
  • Selenium
03

Results

What is documented is that a targeted security assessment was carried out. The documentation states neither a number of remediated vulnerabilities nor an independent security attestation. The results therefore show only the assessment areas that are evidenced.

  • Tenant isolation assessed
  • Access rules examined
  • Storage and web attack surfaces evaluated

Project profile

  • CustomerNot named
  • PartnerInnowise
  • IndustryDigital marketplaces

Technologies

  • Acunetix
  • Netsparker
  • Selenium

Further reading